Secondhand-Market Fraud Report 5

I'm back with a report after a long while. The reason is that I confirmed the account-lender's intent to repay the debt, and the money is coming in. First, the procedure is as follows.

1. Report the actual fraud suspect — not the account-lender — to the police / file a complaint through the prosecution.

2. Wait until the result of the report/complaint comes out.

3. The suspect is identified and sent to trial, through which you apply for a payment order against the suspect (in my case this wasn't possible),
or it concludes with the suspect's name unknown, and with no indictment made against the account-lender either, the case is suspended (in my case).

4. After that, I too was twiddling my thumbs.

5. Then a fellow fraud victim contacts me. They were a victim of the same fraud via the same account-lender. That person had begun an unjust-enrichment return lawsuit through the Supreme Court's self-represented electronic litigation.

6. That person filed an unjust-enrichment return lawsuit against the account-lender and ultimately won. In current Supreme Court precedent, there is a ruling that the account-lender too bears a partial obligation to repay. That's why this was possible. So I chose between two options.

1) I, too, file an unjust-enrichment return lawsuit.

2) If I can contact the account-lender, I contact them and, without filing an unjust-enrichment return lawsuit, receive partial repayment of the debt.

7. Fortunately, option 2) came together, and I'm now in a situation where I'm receiving repayment of the debt from the account-lender in fixed monthly amounts.

8. Others will probably be similar once the suspect's name becomes unknown. In that case, there's no direct method other than filing an unjust-enrichment return lawsuit. The actual suspect is far too unlikely to turn up. In any case, the point at which I started getting the gains returned this way took about a year in total. Well, it took a long time.